Work Outline for Comprehensive Test Suite
Bran S
archsbran at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 07:57:08 UTC 2020
Please share your thoughts.
On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 21:54, Bran S <archsbran at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Below is the work outline for the gsoc proposal, please suggest
> improvements wherever required.
>
> Work Outline:
>
> 1) Currently the strace-DDD.test fails, and as mentioned on the
> mailing list there is an intermittent problem with strace-DD.test[1].
> The solution to the strace-DDD.test is already proposed on the mailing
> list[2]. It would be implemented and submitted for review.
>
> 2) After that the problem with strace-DD.test will be reproduced and a
> solution will be proposed and discussed for further action.
>
> 3) Involve in extending decoder capability which could be helpful in
> understanding to write tests better. For ex: extending HDIO_* decoder.
> As currently only HDIO_GETGEO is available.
>
> 4) Write decoder tests wherever required. The coverage of files like
> fs_x_ioctl, statx, sysctl, ubi, kvm, term is close 0%. These would be
> the first targets.
>
> 5) Further discuss about critical files which need test coverage. For
> ex: prctl, process, ioctl, etc.
>
> 6) Understand previous code[3][4][5] and move on to write behavioural
> corner case tests to check for type sizes, signedness, handling of
> pointers to invalid memory, etc.
>
> [1] https://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/2020-March/009477.html
> [2] https://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/2020-March/009536.html
> [3] https://gitlab.com/strace/strace/commit/99d8edef0078
> [4] https://gitlab.com/strace/strace/commit/a02a583b3fca
> [5] https://gitlab.com/strace/strace/commit/4278e6613f48
More information about the Strace-devel
mailing list