[PATCH v6 10/13] tests/wait4: Skip tests if __NR_wait4 syscall isn't defined

[Alistair Francis]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 5:01 PM Dmitry V. Levin <ldv at altlinux.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:09:36PM -0700, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > New y2038 safe 32-bit architectures don't have the __NR_wait4 syscall,
> > so let's skip the test.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/wait4.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/wait4.c b/tests/wait4.c
> > index 29b0cadd..735a27c9 100644
> > --- a/tests/wait4.c
> > +++ b/tests/wait4.c
> > @@ -9,12 +9,15 @@
> >   */
> >
> >  #include "tests.h"
> > -#include <assert.h>
> > -#include <signal.h>
> > -#include <stdio.h>
> > -#include <unistd.h>
> > -#include <sys/wait.h>
> > -#include <sys/resource.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef __NR_wait4
>
> Does it mean that wait4 entry should be moved from linux/32/syscallent.h
> to linux/32/syscallent-time32.h?

Yep, fixed.

Alistair

>
> Otherwise the ifdef you are going to add will stop working
> as soon as "scno.h" is included.
>
>
> --
> ldv