Q: can rlim_t be a long long type on linux

[Denys Vlasenko]

On 03/17/2012 06:17 PM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 05:45:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Friday 16 March 2012 16:18:33 Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> "Dmitry V. Levin" writes:
>>>> Is it correct that rlim_t cannot be a long long type on linux,
>>>> or am I missing something?
>>>
>>> x32 is going to be the first.
>>
>> mips/n32 doesn't ?
>
> btw, how one can reliably identify that kind of information
> just looking at the kernel?
>
> For example, we have an oddness in file.c with several different
> definitions of sys_lseek, one for HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, another for
> !HAVE_LONG_LONG_OFF_T, and yet another one for LINUX_MIPSN32 where
> off_t is actually emulated via "long long".  How could it be that
> off_t is not a "long long" type but lseek takes a "long long"
> argument?

Dmitry, I'm working on that one... Want to set up multi-arch
build test before I mess it up though...

-- 
vda