[PATCH] Add biarch support for powerpc64

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 02:34:58PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > There is actually one case where the names differ: newfstatat
> > vs. fstatat64.  But that's the only one.
> 
> Ah, right you are.  That's a pretty stupid name difference, IMHO.
> But it is what the __NR_* constants are called, which is as close
> as we have to a single official name for Linux syscalls.  I think
> it wouldn't hurt to call it fstatat64 on ppc64 too.  I also think
> it wouldn't hurt to just use #ifdef __powerpc64__ in the one table.
> But I also won't argue if you feel strongly that this is reason enough
> to use arch=powerpc64 and separate files.

That's my concern, too.  I'd rather avoid a full clone of
powerpc/syscallent.h just because of this name difference.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20100708/d0a396a5/attachment.bin>