[PATCH v8] tests/fcntl.c: add test for print_f_owner_ex

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 06:14:09PM +0800, Zhibin Li wrote:
> Hi, all
> 
> I think my progress may be a little slow now considering I haven't made
> this patch
> acceptable yet. I submitted my proposal just before the deadline without
> discussion so there
> must be a lot of problems. In this community bonding period I'm trying to
> make myself ready
> for coding but I kinda don't know which specific part of tests I should
> start with. The ratio of
> coverage on codecov is a good reference. Should I just start with the part
> with the least coverage?

Yes, the coverage shown on codecov is a good starting point, with one
exception: the kernel where the test suite is running is relatively old,
and some tests might be skipped because of that.

> I hope you guys can tell me something about what is feasible and what is
> not.

I suggest you to do a little research and find out for yourself what looks
more feasible, then we discuss your findings and make a more detailed plan
for the coding period.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20180503/aff68f29/attachment.bin>