[PATCH v4] Implemented -e trace=%clock option

[Rishi Bhatt]

well so i have changed clock.tests's comment style.Below is the patch.Also
i have changed the version to what you have set in subject.

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 7:37 AM, Rishi Bhatt <bhatt.rishi062 at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <ldv at altlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 07:35:49PM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote:
>> > Hey if i am taking rt_sigretrun,nanosleep as negative testcases i am
>> > getting sigusr and sigalarm respectively, i should not get them right?
>> > Also sched.test is also failing for them. Well i have included fstat and
>> > open as negatives.
>> >
>> > The way these test is made which expect the last output to be
>> > '+++ exited with 0 +++'  -> this is causing the test failure for some
>> tests
>> > from the suite.Well should i work to make this test better or there is
>> > something else which i am not taking into consideration?
>>
>> Some test programs cannot be easily reused for this %clock test because
>> they fork, raise/catch signals, etc.
>>
>> But hundreds of test programs are well fit for this test: their strace
>> output consists of syscalls and the final "exited" line only.
>>
>> > From ba969213641b0c80defc908a6921ba4b498de0a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Rishi Bhatt <bhatt.rishi062 at gmail.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 14:41:55 +0530
>> > Subject: [PATCH v4] Implemented -e trace=%clock option
>>
>> v4? Again?
>>
>
> So which one is it?
>
>>
>> [...]
>> > --- a/sysent.h
>> > +++ b/sysent.h
>> > @@ -22,5 +22,6 @@ typedef struct sysent {
>> >  #define TRACE_INDIRECT_SUBCALL       02000   /* Syscall is an indirect
>> socket/ipc subcall. */
>> >  #define COMPAT_SYSCALL_TYPES 04000   /* A compat syscall that uses
>> compat types. */
>> >  #define TRACE_SCHED          010000  /* Trace scheduler-related
>> syscalls. */
>> > +#define TRACE_CLOCK          020000  /*Trace clock-related syscalls. */
>>
>> Unfortunately, I have to repeat myself:
>>
>> "Please follow the style used in the file you are patching,
>> in particular, the style of comments."
>>
>
> In clock.test,and any other file?
>
>>
>>
>> --
>> ldv
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Strace-devel mailing list
>> Strace-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170319/54122d57/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: v2-0004-Implemented-e-trace-clock-option.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 45101 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170319/54122d57/attachment.bin>