question about some kinds of testcases

["Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"]

On 03/22/2016 08:08 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:51:29AM +0800, "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I noticed that the following kinds of cases haven't been covered.
>> Are these testcases needed?
>>
>> 1. testcases of some options such as "-ttt","-E"...
>
> Most of them definitely worth testing.
>
>> 2. testcases of syscalls with "-p" option
>
> There are some differences in the way how processes are attached/detached
> with/without -p option, but syscall filtering mechanism shouldn't be
> affected.
>
>> 3. testcases of syscalls with multi-process program
>
> We have some multi-process tests.  I'm not sure I understand your
> question.
>


I mean test each syscall using multi-process program.

I think it just likes the "-p" option.
The syscall filtering won't be affected.
So it is also meaningless.

Thanks for your reply.

-- 
Thanks
Zhou

>> 4. testcases of high load such as
>> 	using deep loop program,
>> 	using a lot of memory before running strace,
>> 	running a lot of strace processes at same time
>
> Yes if they really test strace and not the underlaying operating system.
>
>> I'm appreciated if you can tell me which are needed.
>
> Every test that extends test coverage is a plus.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Strace-devel mailing list
> Strace-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
>