[uClibc] strace 4.5.3 versus gcc 3.4 snapshot 20040406 uclibc mipsel

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Tue May 11 17:23:42 UTC 2004

On Tue May 11, 2004 at 04:57:35PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> Using gcc 3.4 and uClibc for mipsel, built without -O, strace 4.5.3 seems to
> work fine, but built -O[1,2,s] strace dies very quicky, doesn't matter
> static or dynamic linked.  It crashes apparently in main() on it's way to
> the first qualify().  Looks like stack mangling.  Seems to work fine with
> gcc 3.3.3.  I'm building gcc 3.4 branch head to try now.  Any other ideas?
> BTW, is http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=strace-devel working?

Sounds like gcc and/or binutils is broken....


Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--

More information about the Strace-devel mailing list