[uClibc] strace 4.5.3 versus gcc 3.4 snapshot 20040406 uclibc mipsel
andersen at codepoet.org
Tue May 11 17:23:42 UTC 2004
On Tue May 11, 2004 at 04:57:35PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote:
> Using gcc 3.4 and uClibc for mipsel, built without -O, strace 4.5.3 seems to
> work fine, but built -O[1,2,s] strace dies very quicky, doesn't matter
> static or dynamic linked. It crashes apparently in main() on it's way to
> the first qualify(). Looks like stack mangling. Seems to work fine with
> gcc 3.3.3. I'm building gcc 3.4 branch head to try now. Any other ideas?
> BTW, is http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=strace-devel working?
Sounds like gcc and/or binutils is broken....
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the Strace-devel