ignore certain failures (-e/-z options)

Paul Chaignon paul.chaignon at gmail.com
Fri Jun 28 14:36:15 UTC 2019

Hi Marty,

There might be a way to implement a -e status=failed:!EAGAIN, but I'd
rather see this implemented in a different patchset that the ongoing one.
Are you planning to work on such an option?


On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 03:55:48PM -0400, marty leisner wrote:
> I'm glad to see work on -z failures  ( I started this in 2002).
> I'm again facing the need for these -- what I need is to ignore certain
> "good" errnos (like EAGAIN)  -- this has to do with
> systems which are polling be able to see "failures" from "failed polls"
> (the failed polls generally overwhelm real failures/good results)
> What I was thinking is a way to have a "list of failures to ignore"
> (primarily EAGAIN).
> marty

> -- 
> Strace-devel mailing list
> Strace-devel at lists.strace.io
> https://lists.strace.io/mailman/listinfo/strace-devel

More information about the Strace-devel mailing list