[PATCH v5 4/4] tests: check status qualifier

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Paul Chaignon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 02:40:54AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
[...]
> > I don't think -e trace=nanosleep is needed in this test.
> >
> > Since the only detached syscall here is nanosleep, it would be better
> > to remove -e trace=nanosleep so the test would be able to detect the
> > situation when status=detached misses that nanosleep syscall.
> 
> Should I use an explicit -e trace=all as you suggested for status-none and
> status-unfinished in a later mail?

There is no need for an explicit -e trace=all in status-detached.test
because it doesn't use run_strace_match_diff.


-- 
ldv