GSOC:Microproject

[Abhishek Tiwari]

On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 3:27 PM, Gabriel Laskar <gabriel at lse.epita.fr> wrote:

> On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 14:31:16 +0530
> Abhishek Tiwari <erabhishektiwarics at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Please do review patch.
>
> It will be way simpler to review with the patch inlined, and not
> attached to your mail.
>
> As a starter:
>
> * your commit message does not explain anything, a better message would
>   be something like what you have in the NEWS file
> * The NEWS file is not updated for the correct version. Also, most of
>   the time, it is the maintainers that adds the digest of the version
>   here.
>
> Made changes as suggested. Patch not attached.

* you did not answer to (message-id:
>   <20180219142319.GJ4439 at asgard.redhat.com>)
>

In this message, it is suggested to make class of different type of system
calls and then user can specify which class to trace.

Last year I completed same microproject to trace statfs-like system calls
and different hierarchy of system calls were define using % and %% i.e. %
would define more specific system call and %% would define general group of
system call.

* Did you started to take into account remarks from  Masatake YAMATO
>   and Eugene Syromiatnikov (discussion starts at message-id:
>   <20180223.174751.218891701122588475.yamato at redhat.com> ) about user
>   defined groups instead of hardocoded ones ?
>

How should we approach for user-defined group of system call?

For microproject should I submit patch for tracing xattr system calls or I
should work on user-defined group of system call?

> --
> Gabriel Laskar
>



-- 
Abhishek Tiwari
M.Tech (CS),
IIT Kharagpur.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20180308/118fb2dc/attachment.html>