GSOC:Microproject

Abhishek Tiwari erabhishektiwarics at gmail.com
Wed Feb 21 18:24:04 UTC 2018


On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Gabriel Laskar <gabriel at lse.epita.fr>
wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:07:59 +0530
> Abhishek Tiwari <erabhishektiwarics at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I want to work on microproject
> >
> > extend -e trace=class syntax with new classes
> >
> >
> > I have gone through mailing list. Is following grouping ok
> >
> > {,l,f}setxattr           TRACE_SETXATTR  TFX
> >
> >
> > -e trace=%setxattr
>
> This is a good start, but from what I see, maybe this group is too
> small, maybe all the syscalls that deals with xattr should be a better
> idea, something like -e trace=%xattr.
>
>
> --
> Gabriel Laskar
>

I have grouped all xattr syscalls and following is attached patch for the
same. Please review.


-- 
Abhishek Tiwari
M.Tech (CS),
IIT Kharagpur.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20180221/f3ca8dee/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Implement-e-trace-xattr-option.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 52205 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20180221/f3ca8dee/attachment.bin>


More information about the Strace-devel mailing list