GSoC 2017 introduction

[Victor Krapivensky]

On 03/09/2017 10:24 PM, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> PS. Btw, by a quick look at the patch (haven't reviewed it yet), I can
> say that you at least forgot to wire up i386 arch [2], improperly
> indented SEN(statx) and most probably would have problems with struct
> statx name clash once glibc decided to support it.
Thank you for the quick review. Everything you mentioned is fixed now.
Other fixes include:
   1. statx may substitute approximate values, so there is no reason to
not print any field based on stx_mask;
   2. AT_STATX_* should be in a separate from xlat/at_flags.in file (2
failed tests because of this -- oops!)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: v2-0001-Add-support-for-statx-syscall.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 9337 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170310/b9358064/attachment.bin>