[PATCH v2] netlink: fix NLMSG_DONE never enter family specific decoder

Dmitry V. Levin ldv at altlinux.org
Mon Jun 26 15:08:40 UTC 2017


On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:59:11PM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 05:48:41PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:22:10PM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 05:03:41PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:29:40AM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote:
> > > > > * netlink.c (print_nlmsghdr): Add condition
> > > > > nlmsghdr->nlmsg_type != NLMSG_DONE.
> > > > > (decode_nlmsg_type): Add condition type != NLMSG_DONE.
> > > > > (decode_nlmsg_flags): Add condition type == NLMSG_DONE.
> > > > > (decode_netlink_sock_diag): Add condition
> > > > > nlmsghdr->nlmsg_type == NLMSG_DONE.
> > > > 
> > > > Now I don't follow.
> > > > 
> > > > What do you want to do with NLMSG_DONE messages, pass them to family
> > > > specific decoders or not?
> > > 
> > > Pass them to family specific decoders.
> > > 
> > > > Ditto with other control messages, do you want to pass them to family
> > > > specific decoders or not?
> > > 
> > > Do not pass them to family specific decoders.
> > 
> > In that case ...
> > 
> > > --- a/netlink.c
> > > +++ b/netlink.c
> > > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ decode_nlmsg_type(const uint16_t type, const unsigned int family)
> > >  	const struct xlat *xlat = netlink_types;
> > >  	const char *dflt = "NLMSG_???";
> > >  
> > > -	if (family < ARRAY_SIZE(nlmsg_types)) {
> > > +	if (type != NLMSG_DONE && family < ARRAY_SIZE(nlmsg_types)) {
> > >  		if (nlmsg_types[family].decoder)
> > >  			decoder = nlmsg_types[family].decoder;
> > >  		if (nlmsg_types[family].xlat)
> > 
> > ... this hunk does something different from what you want because
> > messages of type == NLMSG_DONE are not passed to the family specific
> > decoder.
> 
> I do not pass them to family specific nlmsg_types_decoder_t,
> only pass them to family specific netlink_decoder_t.
> Is this idea not easy to understand?

This is not quite obvious.  Would you like to describe your intention
in the commit message, please?


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170626/f9eb005f/attachment.bin>


More information about the Strace-devel mailing list