[PATCH RFC v1 1/1] Initial support for Lua scripting

Dmitry V. Levin ldv at altlinux.org
Sun Jun 18 21:36:41 UTC 2017

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 03:35:01PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 02:46:22PM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> > Well, I don't consider having a commonly used stringification macro a
> > namespace pollution.
> But that's exactly what's happened -- I chose a name without prefix,
> #undef'd it at the end of the header, and relied on that it wouldn't
> clash with anything.
> > It also makes sense to move it to defs.h before
> > the mpers_type.h inclusion, for yet another option.
> Now that STRINGIFY/CONTENT macros are duplicated in multiple files, it's
> not an option.

Do we need so many different stringify macros?
Could we harmonize them somehow?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170619/66a4df75/attachment.bin>

More information about the Strace-devel mailing list