[PATCH v1 1/1] pathtrace.c: introduce pathtrace_match_set instead of pathtrace_match

[Victor Krapivensky]

On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 03:25:43PM +0700, Nikolay Marchuk wrote:
> I don't think that it is necessary to rename static functions. These
> functions don't change their behaviour a lot and are used only in
> pathtrace.c. Only pathtrace_match renaming is useful for compatibility.

> I have also implemented similar pathtrace api for path filter, but my
> implementation uses new  path_set struct to pass both paths_selected and
> num_selected, and pathtrace_select also supports user-provided sets.
> I will send my version of implementation in next message.
OK, ignore my patch then.