[PATCH 2/4] qualify: fix signal=SIG_0 and signal=0 do not print error message

Dmitry V. Levin ldv at altlinux.org
Fri Jan 6 13:21:11 UTC 2017

On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 03:16:28PM +0800, JingPiao Chen wrote:
> SIG_0 is not valid signal name, do not have signal number is 0.

Despite SIG_0 not being a valid signal name and signal number 0 not being
a valid signal, -e signal=0 should not be disallowed.  There are some weird
circumstances when a process can be reported as have been killed by signal 0.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20170106/61c3fcca/attachment.bin>

More information about the Strace-devel mailing list