strace 4.14 released
heiko.carstens at de.ibm.com
Wed Oct 5 12:07:42 UTC 2016
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +0000, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse.de> wrote:
> > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov <evgsyr-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the
> >> environment in order to get nanosleep?
> > What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"?
> In order to get nanosleep with usable precision, sorry.
This has nothing to do with nanosleep being not precise on s390. Most
probably the hypervisor is simply overcomitted and therefore rarely
scheduled the guest that ran the strace test suite.
This can happen on any architecture where you run the tests in a virtual
More information about the Strace-devel