question about some kinds of testcases

["Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑"]

On 03/22/2016 08:31 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 08:22:23AM +0800, "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" wrote:
>> On 03/22/2016 08:08 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:51:29AM +0800, "Zhou, Wenjian/周文剑" wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that the following kinds of cases haven't been covered.
>>>> Are these testcases needed?
>>>>
>>>> 1. testcases of some options such as "-ttt","-E"...
>>>
>>> Most of them definitely worth testing.
>>>
>>>> 2. testcases of syscalls with "-p" option
>>>
>>> There are some differences in the way how processes are attached/detached
>>> with/without -p option, but syscall filtering mechanism shouldn't be
>>> affected.
>>>
>>>> 3. testcases of syscalls with multi-process program
>>>
>>> We have some multi-process tests.  I'm not sure I understand your
>>> question.
>>
>> I mean test each syscall using multi-process program.
>>
>> I think it just likes the "-p" option.
>> The syscall filtering won't be affected.
>
> Syscall filtering is not affected, but output is, so it might be useful
> in some cases, see e.g. tests/count-f.test.
>

I see.

-- 
Thanks
Zhou

>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785351&iu=/4140
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Strace-devel mailing list
> Strace-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/strace-devel
>