[PATCH 3/4] Introduce syscall fault injection feature

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 05:51:07PM +0200, Nahim El Atmani wrote:
[...]
> Ok, let's take a small example to see why neither letting the accounting
> information in a global scope nor letting the flag as it in the tcp does work.
> If we have two tracees, and we want to cancel the second write *each* of them
> may issue, we will end up doing something like:

Are you are going to implement fault injection of each Nth syscall on
per-tracee basic?  This is surely going to be more complicated than
global Nth fault injection.  What are the benefits?  Reproducibility?


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20160811/f16d53bd/attachment.bin>