Preparing for the next release: call for testing

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 12:04:27PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 02 Mar 2015 14:31, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On s390, besides kernel bug with si_addr, all printed instruction pointers
> > have 0x80000000 bit set.  If it isn't a kernel bug (and it doesn't look like
> > one), then it's a strace bug in not taking some s390 address mapping
> > feature into account.
> 
> since it's not a regression and no one has complained yet, and we know s390 is 
> broken in at least one way, i think we just wait for the kernel guys to respond 
> before we spend more time investigating.

OK, what should we do with the test on s390/s390x then? xfail or skip?


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20150302/111656c5/attachment.bin>