[PATCH/RFC] decode extend getsockopt/setsockopt options
Dmitry V. Levin
ldv at altlinux.org
Wed Aug 19 17:36:15 UTC 2015
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 01:26:56PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 19 Aug 2015 18:56, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 05:03:20PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > [...]
> > > * util.c (printxval): Rename to ...
> > > (printxvals): ... this. Rewrite to be varargs based.
> > > * xlat/getsockipoptions.in: New xlat list.
> > > * xlat/getsockipv6options.in, xlat/setsockipoptions.in,
> > > xlat/setsockipv6options.in: Likewise.
> > > ---
> > > RFC: i'm not terribly happy with the printxvals logic. open to suggestions.
> >
> > What's it in the printxvals logic that doesn't make you happy?
>
> using varargs all the time when the previous code was just a simple func.
> seems like it's adding a good amount of overhead. maybe i'm pessimistic
> as i haven't done any perf checks.
We can have two separate functions, it's not a big deal.
--
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20150819/94b5740b/attachment.bin>
More information about the Strace-devel
mailing list