[PATCH] powerpc64/linux: Fix 64-bit process detection on embedded
Dmitry V. Levin
ldv at altlinux.org
Tue Feb 25 22:33:58 UTC 2014
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 07:10:53PM -0600, James Yang wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2014, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 03:32:43PM -0600, James Yang wrote:
> > > * syscall.c: Fix 64-bit process detection on embedded powerpc
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: James Yang <james.yang at freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > > syscall.c | 5 +++--
> > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/syscall.c b/syscall.c
> > > index 3477dcd..8d47e7e 100644
> > > --- a/syscall.c
> > > +++ b/syscall.c
> > > @@ -1222,8 +1222,9 @@ get_scno(struct tcb *tcp)
> > > int currpers;
> > >
> > > /* Check for 64/32 bit mode. */
> > > - /* SF is bit 0 of MSR */
> > > - if ((ppc_regs.msr >> 63) & 1)
> > > + /* SF is bit 0 of MSR (a 64-bit register in Server) */
> > > + /* CM is bit 0 of MSR (a 32-bit register in Embedded) */
> > > + if (((ppc_regs.msr >> 63) & 1) || ((ppc_regs.msr >> 31) & 1))
> > > currpers = 0;
> > > else
> > > currpers = 1;
> >
> > In case of 64-bit MSR, that would be a test for 32th bit.
> > I'm not quite familiar with ppc64, is there any risk for a false positive
> > in this case?
>
> When tested on a POWER7 running Linux, MSR bit 32 is clear. So
> empircally, it is not in use.
>
> It is documented as part of a reserved field according to Power ISA
> Book III-S so it should read as 0 unless there's an implementation-
> specific use of the bit. No documentation I have found describes the
> use of it as other than reserved.
OK, let's assume it's safe to do the check this way.
There seems to be a shorter equivalent check for these two bits:
ppc_regs.msr & 0x8000000080000000
Which of them would you prefer, the longer one or the shorter one?
--
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20140226/3d8181d5/attachment.bin>
More information about the Strace-devel
mailing list