[PATCH] sigaction test: support arches w/out SA_RESTORER and swapped args

[Mike Frysinger]

Running Linux 3.15 (sparc64) and glibc 2.17 (sparc32) triggers a
rt_sigaction call that does not use SA_RESTORER and has an order
where it inserts a restorer and a size.  The current tests don't
support that ordering, so add another regex.

* tests/sigaction.awk: Support no SA_RESTORER and swapped args.
---
 tests/sigaction.awk | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/sigaction.awk b/tests/sigaction.awk
index 5bd0568..0fa618f 100644
--- a/tests/sigaction.awk
+++ b/tests/sigaction.awk
@@ -6,7 +6,8 @@
 #
 # There are two regexps for each test:
 # the 1st is for any architecture with SA_RESTORER, including SPARC;
-# the 2nd is for any architecture without SA_RESTORER, including ALPHA.
+# the 2nd is for any architecture without SA_RESTORER, including ALPHA;
+# the 3rd is for any architecture without SA_RESTORER, including SPARC.
 
 BEGIN {
 	lines = 5
@@ -16,18 +17,22 @@ BEGIN {
 # Test 1.
 NR == 1 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTORER\|SA_RESTART, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 NR == 1 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, (4|8|16)(, 0x[0-9a-f]+)?\) = 0$/ {next}
+NR == 1 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTART}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 
 # Test 2.
 NR == 2 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_RESTORER\|SA_SIGINFO, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTORER\|SA_RESTART, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 NR == 2 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_SIGINFO}, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTART}, (4|8|16)(, 0x[0-9a-f]+)?\) = 0$/ {next}
+NR == 2 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_SIGINFO}, {SIG_IGN, \[HUP INT\], SA_RESTART}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 
 # Test 3.
 NR == 3 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, \[\], SA_RESTORER, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_RESTORER\|SA_SIGINFO, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 NR == 3 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_SIGINFO}, (4|8|16)(, 0x[0-9a-f]+)?\) = 0$/ {next}
+NR == 3 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, {0x[0-9a-f]+, \[QUIT TERM\], SA_SIGINFO}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 
 # Test 4.
 NR == 4 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, ~\[HUP( ((RT|SIGRT)[^] ]+|[3-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]))*\], SA_RESTORER, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], SA_RESTORER, 0x[0-9a-f]+}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 NR == 4 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, ~\[HUP( ((RT|SIGRT)[^] ]+|[3-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]))*\], 0}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, (4|8|16)(, 0x[0-9a-f]+)?\) = 0$/ {next}
+NR == 4 && /^rt_sigaction\(SIGUSR2, {SIG_DFL, ~\[HUP( ((RT|SIGRT)[^] ]+|[3-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]))*\], 0}, {SIG_DFL, \[\], 0}, (0x[0-9a-f]+, )?(4|8|16)\) = 0$/ {next}
 
 # The last line.
 NR == lines && /^\+\+\+ exited with 0 \+\+\+$/ {next}
-- 
2.0.0