strace sys_clone bug on x86-32
enh at google.com
Wed Apr 9 16:12:52 UTC 2014
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:20 AM, Dmitry V. Levin <ldv at altlinux.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 12:41:17PM -0700, enh wrote:
>> Fix clone(2) argument order for 32-bit processes on x86-64.
>> if you want to get fancy, you can also decode the LDT user_desc
>> entries (like you would if you were using an x86 strace to trace an
>> x86 process):
> Thanks, applied both patches, and added the same change for X32.
thanks. sorry about missing x32 --- i don't [knowingly] have anything
x32 so i wasn't sure which style it used.
More information about the Strace-devel