[PATCH] sparc

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 06:25:03PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if you want to focus on the main builds (sparc32/linux and sparc64/linux), 
> then yes, deleting all the sys_{sem,msg,shm}* defines and prototypes here 
> doesnt seem to make a difference.  both compile fine, and seem to run OK.  
> although i dont have any quick examples of apps that use these funcs 
> explicitly since the sysv ipc/shm/etc... tend to be ignored by everyone in 
> favor of other mechanisms.

ipcs/ipcmk/ipcrm cover some of them.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20110220/e717989b/attachment.bin>