scm choice

[Mike Frysinger]

On Monday 23 February 2009 22:39:33 Roland McGrath wrote:
> No opinions here.  Git is fine with me if the conversion doesn't lose
> anything.  Fortunately we have never used cvs branching to speak of, so
> there are probably no headaches.  I also would not object at all if people
> wanted to move the hosting.  (SF has been kind of spotty in my experience,
> but tolerable.)

considering the only thing the strace project uses is mailing list, scm, and 
download, seems like a transfer would be more hassle.  in other areas (like 
bug tracker), sf certainly sucks imo, but in these areas it seems to be ok.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.strace.io/pipermail/strace-devel/attachments/20090223/22de9a47/attachment.bin>