[PATCH] on Linux, use ints, not longs, for PIDs in waitpid decoding
Denys Vlasenko
dvlasenk at redhat.com
Thu Apr 16 12:12:29 UTC 2009
Hi,
I observed several times wait4(4294967295, ...) instead of wait4(-1, ...).
Kernel code inspection shows that kernel always stores PID
into pid_t typed variable, and pid_t is invariably an int
on all architectures. Thus, 4294967295 will be seen as -1 in kernel,
even on 64-bit machines.
Here is the patch I am applying to fix this:
--
vda
--- strace.0/process.c 2009-04-14 14:51:00.000000000 +0200
+++ strace.1/process.c 2009-04-15 16:49:24.000000000 +0200
@@ -1998,21 +1998,24 @@ printwaitn(struct tcb *tcp, int n, int b
int exited = 0;
if (entering(tcp)) {
- /*
- * Sign-extend a 32-bit value when that's what it is.
- *
- * NB: On Linux, kernel-side pid_t is typedef'ed to int
- * on all arches; also, glibc-2.8 truncates wait3 and wait4
+#ifdef LINUX
+ /* On Linux, kernel-side pid_t is typedef'ed to int
+ * on all arches. Also, glibc-2.8 truncates wait3 and wait4
* pid argument to int on 64bit arches, producing,
* for example, wait4(4294967295, ...) instead of -1
- * in strace.
- * Therefore, maybe it makes sense to *unconditionally*
- * widen int to long here...
+ * in strace. We have to use int here, not long.
+ */
+ int pid = tcp->u_arg[0];
+ tprintf("%d, ", pid);
+#else
+ /*
+ * Sign-extend a 32-bit value when that's what it is.
*/
long pid = tcp->u_arg[0];
if (personality_wordsize[current_personality] < sizeof pid)
pid = (long) (int) pid;
tprintf("%ld, ", pid);
+#endif
} else {
/* status */
if (!tcp->u_arg[1])
More information about the Strace-devel
mailing list