"Richard Kettlewell <rkettlewell at zeus.com> writes: > "John Hughes" <john at Calva.COM> writes: > > Should be conditional on HAVE_SYS_UIO_H, no point testing for > > it if we don't use the test. > > Looking closer, there are more unconditional iovecs in io.c and > strace.c which should also be fixed in this way. Yes, and I think I wrote some of them!